翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ex Parte Dittmarn ・ Ex Parte Douallier ・ Ex parte Endo ・ Ex Parte Estate Davies ・ Ex parte Fisk ・ Ex parte Garland ・ Ex parte Goldman ・ Ex Parte Graham ・ Ex parte Gutta ・ Ex parte Harmse ・ Ex parte Henning ・ Ex parte Joins ・ Ex parte Levitt ・ Ex parte Lundgren ・ Ex Parte Lutchman ・ Ex parte Madrazzo ・ Ex Parte Maurice ・ Ex parte McCardle ・ Ex Parte McDonald ・ Ex parte McQuillon ・ Ex Parte Meier ・ Ex parte Merryman ・ Ex parte Milligan ・ Ex Parte Naude ・ Ex parte Quayle ・ Ex parte Quirin ・ Ex Parte Sidelsky ・ Ex parte Slabbert ・ Ex parte Steenkamp and Steenkamp ・ Ex parte Stephens' Estate Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ex parte Madrazzo ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ex parte Madrazzo ''Ex parte Madrazzo'', , was a United States Supreme Court case involving the suit of Juan Madrazo, a citizen of the Kingdom of Spain, against the state of Georgia. == Background == This was Juan Madrazo's second encounter with the United States court system. Madrazo’s ship ''Isabelita'' was originally captured by a ship flying under the flag of Amelia, a colony in revolt from the Kingdom of Spain that had received no international recognition and was mainly run by Americans. A court in the said country deemed the capture of the ''Isabelita'' and her cargo of slaves legal booty and sold them to William Bowen. Bowen later transported the slaves to the Creek nation where they were captured in the state of Georgia. After their capture Governor John Clark of Georgia ordered some of them to be sold while the others remained in his possession. After a round of suits in the district court of Georgia, Madrazo filed a suit in the circuit court on appeal. It was argued whether the district court had jurisdiction of the case. The circuit court ruled that it had jurisdiction and restored the slaves to Madrazo. Georgia appealed to the Supreme Court on the basis that the case was not a case of admiralty, but instead a case against the state, giving Madrazo no grounds for a case because of the 11th Amendment. Marshall wrote in his opinion of ''Governor of Georgia v. Madrazo'', 26 US (1 Pet.) 110 (1828), that Madrazo’s claim against the Governor of Georgia was against a state because the Governor was acting in his official office of Governor and he did not have basis because of the 11th Amendment which forbids cases of law or equity against a state. He did leave a loophole that the 11th Amendment of the Constitution leaves out cases of admiralty for sovereign immunity of states and that they are of original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ex parte Madrazzo」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.